Background/Objectives: Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) commonly causes vision loss from macular edema (ME). OCT biomarkers (IRF, SRF, HRF, and ELM/EZ disruption) inform prognosis and treatment but are rarely quantified routinely due to time burden and interobserver variability. We aimed to validate a deep-learning algorithm for automated detection and quantification of key OCT biomarkers in RVO-ME versus expert assessment. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, 93 eyes with RVO-ME imaged with spectral-domain OCT were analyzed. The AI quantified IRF/SRF volumes, ELM/EZ interruption, and HRF counts. Two masked expert clinicians provided reference evaluations. Performance and agreement were assessed using ROC AUC, Cohen’s kappa, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson correlation, and Bland–Altman analysis. Image-quality metrics (foveal centration and retinal layer segmentation) were recorded. Results: The AI showed high diagnostic performance (AUC: SRF 0.969; ELM 0.871; EZ 0.958) and substantial-to-almost-perfect agreement (kappa: SRF 0.807; ELM 0.788; EZ 0.914). HRF quantification correlated strongly with experts (r = 0.89, p < 0.001), with very good agreement (ICC = 0.87) and minimal bias. Image-quality accuracy exceeded 98% for foveal centration and layer segmentation. Conclusions: This AI software enables reliable, rapid automated assessment of major OCT biomarkers in RVO-ME, supporting streamlined personalized management; prospective studies should confirm longitudinal monitoring and treatment-guidance value.

Validation of an Automated AI Algorithm for the Quantification of Major OCT Parameters in Retinal Vein Occlusion–Related Macular Edema

Carnevali, Adriano
;
Chisari, Domenico;Gioia, Raffaella;Mancini, Alessandra;Borselli, Massimiliano;Lucisano, Andrea;Carnovale Scalzo, Giovanna;Scorcia, Vincenzo;
2026-01-01

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) commonly causes vision loss from macular edema (ME). OCT biomarkers (IRF, SRF, HRF, and ELM/EZ disruption) inform prognosis and treatment but are rarely quantified routinely due to time burden and interobserver variability. We aimed to validate a deep-learning algorithm for automated detection and quantification of key OCT biomarkers in RVO-ME versus expert assessment. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, 93 eyes with RVO-ME imaged with spectral-domain OCT were analyzed. The AI quantified IRF/SRF volumes, ELM/EZ interruption, and HRF counts. Two masked expert clinicians provided reference evaluations. Performance and agreement were assessed using ROC AUC, Cohen’s kappa, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson correlation, and Bland–Altman analysis. Image-quality metrics (foveal centration and retinal layer segmentation) were recorded. Results: The AI showed high diagnostic performance (AUC: SRF 0.969; ELM 0.871; EZ 0.958) and substantial-to-almost-perfect agreement (kappa: SRF 0.807; ELM 0.788; EZ 0.914). HRF quantification correlated strongly with experts (r = 0.89, p < 0.001), with very good agreement (ICC = 0.87) and minimal bias. Image-quality accuracy exceeded 98% for foveal centration and layer segmentation. Conclusions: This AI software enables reliable, rapid automated assessment of major OCT biomarkers in RVO-ME, supporting streamlined personalized management; prospective studies should confirm longitudinal monitoring and treatment-guidance value.
2026
artificial intelligence
biomarkers
ellipsoid zone
external limiting membrane
hyperreflective retinal foci
intraretinal fluid
macular edema
optical coherence tomography
retinal vein occlusion
subretinal fluid
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12317/123745
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact