To assess myocardial positron emission tomography (PET) positivity after negative or low-grade bone scintigraphy, while distinguishing test discordance from independently confirmed cardiac amyloidosis. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched through 5 August 2026, with targeted source assessment through 2 October 2026. Negative and low-grade imaging denoted Perugini grades 0 and 1, respectively; study-defined negative results were described separately. Eligibility required linked PET and bone-scan results with an extractable denominator. Acquisition modality, PET thresholds and cardiac reference standards were examined. A restricted synthesis required documented tomographic acquisition; a broader three-report synthesis was exploratory. Nine reports provided extractable paired results. In the hereditary transthyretin subgroup examined with carbon-11 Pittsburgh compound B, 20/23 participants were PET-positive after excluding one acquired, domino-transplant case. The exploratory pooled proportion was 87.0% (95% profile-likelihood confidence interval, 68.5–97.8%). Restriction to clearly documented cohort-wide tomography retained only two reports, precluding the planned pooled analysis. Uptake definitions and cardiac verification differed substantially. General diagnostic studies without complete bone-grade denominators, including REVEAL, were excluded from the eligible synthesis and retained as context. PET positivity is common in selected hereditary transthyretin cohorts with negative or low-grade bone scans, but does not establish cardiac amyloidosis or earlier diagnosis. Conditional diagnostic accuracy remains unresolved. Prospective paired studies require tomographic localization, tracer-specific thresholds and independent cardiac verification.

Amyloid-targeted PET after negative or low-grade bone scintigraphy for cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic review

Chiaravalloti A.;
2026-01-01

Abstract

To assess myocardial positron emission tomography (PET) positivity after negative or low-grade bone scintigraphy, while distinguishing test discordance from independently confirmed cardiac amyloidosis. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched through 5 August 2026, with targeted source assessment through 2 October 2026. Negative and low-grade imaging denoted Perugini grades 0 and 1, respectively; study-defined negative results were described separately. Eligibility required linked PET and bone-scan results with an extractable denominator. Acquisition modality, PET thresholds and cardiac reference standards were examined. A restricted synthesis required documented tomographic acquisition; a broader three-report synthesis was exploratory. Nine reports provided extractable paired results. In the hereditary transthyretin subgroup examined with carbon-11 Pittsburgh compound B, 20/23 participants were PET-positive after excluding one acquired, domino-transplant case. The exploratory pooled proportion was 87.0% (95% profile-likelihood confidence interval, 68.5–97.8%). Restriction to clearly documented cohort-wide tomography retained only two reports, precluding the planned pooled analysis. Uptake definitions and cardiac verification differed substantially. General diagnostic studies without complete bone-grade denominators, including REVEAL, were excluded from the eligible synthesis and retained as context. PET positivity is common in selected hereditary transthyretin cohorts with negative or low-grade bone scans, but does not establish cardiac amyloidosis or earlier diagnosis. Conditional diagnostic accuracy remains unresolved. Prospective paired studies require tomographic localization, tracer-specific thresholds and independent cardiac verification.
2026
Bone scintigraphy
Cardiac amyloidosis
Perugini grade
Positron emission tomography
SPECT/CT
Systematic review
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12317/123854
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact