To compare quality of voice in patients treated by supracricoid laryngectomy and patients treated by modified supracricoid laryngectomy using the sternohyoid muscle for neoglottis reconstruction.STUDY DESIGN:Case series. Setting. Teaching hospital.SUBJECTS AND METHODS:This study was performed between 2004 and 2008 on 28 consecutive patients affected by T1b-T2 laryngeal carcinoma. Eleven patients were treated by supracricoid laryngectomy, and 17 patients were treated by modified supracricoid laryngectomy. For each patient, postoperative parameters such as decannulation time, nasogastric feeding tube, and length of hospitalization were noted. Vocal function, Voice Handicap Index scores, and perceptual voice analysis scores on intelligibility, noise, fluency, and voice scale were evaluated.RESULTS:The postoperative course of the patients treated by modified supracricoid laryngectomy was similar to patients treated by supracricoid laryngectomy. No delay in the length of hospitalization was detected in patients undergoing surgery with the new technique. A significant difference was detected in the nasogastric tube removal time and decannulation time. The data from intelligibility, noise, fluency, and voice scale analyses revealed a better quality of voice in patients treated by modified supracricoid partial laryngectomy with a significant difference in intelligibility, fluency, and voicing. The Voice Handicap Index mean value of physical, functional, and emotional subscales confirmed patients' perceptions of a minor voice handicap in patients treated by modified supracricoid laryngectomy, with a significant difference on the physical subscale.CONCLUSION:Modified supracricoid laryngectomy seems to be a good way to improve quality of voice and quality of life in patients with early laryngeal cancer.
Quality of Voice Evaluation in Patients Treated by Supracricoid Laryngectomy andModified Supracricoid Laryngectomy
Allegra E;Lombardo N;La Boria A;Bianco MR;Garozzo A
2011-01-01
Abstract
To compare quality of voice in patients treated by supracricoid laryngectomy and patients treated by modified supracricoid laryngectomy using the sternohyoid muscle for neoglottis reconstruction.STUDY DESIGN:Case series. Setting. Teaching hospital.SUBJECTS AND METHODS:This study was performed between 2004 and 2008 on 28 consecutive patients affected by T1b-T2 laryngeal carcinoma. Eleven patients were treated by supracricoid laryngectomy, and 17 patients were treated by modified supracricoid laryngectomy. For each patient, postoperative parameters such as decannulation time, nasogastric feeding tube, and length of hospitalization were noted. Vocal function, Voice Handicap Index scores, and perceptual voice analysis scores on intelligibility, noise, fluency, and voice scale were evaluated.RESULTS:The postoperative course of the patients treated by modified supracricoid laryngectomy was similar to patients treated by supracricoid laryngectomy. No delay in the length of hospitalization was detected in patients undergoing surgery with the new technique. A significant difference was detected in the nasogastric tube removal time and decannulation time. The data from intelligibility, noise, fluency, and voice scale analyses revealed a better quality of voice in patients treated by modified supracricoid partial laryngectomy with a significant difference in intelligibility, fluency, and voicing. The Voice Handicap Index mean value of physical, functional, and emotional subscales confirmed patients' perceptions of a minor voice handicap in patients treated by modified supracricoid laryngectomy, with a significant difference on the physical subscale.CONCLUSION:Modified supracricoid laryngectomy seems to be a good way to improve quality of voice and quality of life in patients with early laryngeal cancer.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
