BACKGROUND: Sutureless aortic valve prostheses have the potential to augment the adoption of alternative incision approaches for aortic valve replacement (AVR ). Still, we lack the evidence on which surgical approach is best associated with sutureless AVR . METHODS: Data on 483 patients undergoing sutureless small incision AVR between 2010-2014 in two European institutions (207 with ministernotomy [MS] and 276 via right anterior minithoracotomy [RAMT]) have been retrospectively analyzed. After propensity score matching, 160 pairs of patients have been selected. RESULTS: No significant difference for in-hospital mortality was observed between MS and RAMT (P=0.12). Both perfusion and aortic cross-clamping times were longer in RAMT group (P<0.0005). Lower incidence of third degree atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker implantation (P=0.04), shorter ventilation times (P<0.0005) and less requirement for pleural drainage/thoracentesis (P=0.007) have been registered in the RAMT group. Follow-up was shorter for RAMT group (14.6 vs. 21.7 months, P<0.0005). Survival by Kaplan-Meier was comparable both for unmatched (P=0.79) and matched (P=0.90) cohorts. Cox regression analysis showed no statistically significant difference for mid-Term survival between the two approaches (P=0.95 for intercohort comparison [MS vs. RAMT]). Mid-Term survival by Cox multivariable proportional hazards regression model was associated with two independent predictors: preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (P=0.021) and prolonged (>24 h) assisted ventilation (P=0.001). CONCLUSION S: Small incision sutureless AVR through both partial sternotomy and right anterior minithoracotomy provides excellent clinical outcomes. Right anterior minithoracotomy, though associated with longer operative times compared to partial sternotomy, may result in less perioperative morbidity, with no difference in early and mid-Term survival.

Alternative incision sutureless aortic valve replacement: Propensity matched comparison between partial sternotomy and right anterior minithoracotomy

Santarpino G.;
2018-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sutureless aortic valve prostheses have the potential to augment the adoption of alternative incision approaches for aortic valve replacement (AVR ). Still, we lack the evidence on which surgical approach is best associated with sutureless AVR . METHODS: Data on 483 patients undergoing sutureless small incision AVR between 2010-2014 in two European institutions (207 with ministernotomy [MS] and 276 via right anterior minithoracotomy [RAMT]) have been retrospectively analyzed. After propensity score matching, 160 pairs of patients have been selected. RESULTS: No significant difference for in-hospital mortality was observed between MS and RAMT (P=0.12). Both perfusion and aortic cross-clamping times were longer in RAMT group (P<0.0005). Lower incidence of third degree atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker implantation (P=0.04), shorter ventilation times (P<0.0005) and less requirement for pleural drainage/thoracentesis (P=0.007) have been registered in the RAMT group. Follow-up was shorter for RAMT group (14.6 vs. 21.7 months, P<0.0005). Survival by Kaplan-Meier was comparable both for unmatched (P=0.79) and matched (P=0.90) cohorts. Cox regression analysis showed no statistically significant difference for mid-Term survival between the two approaches (P=0.95 for intercohort comparison [MS vs. RAMT]). Mid-Term survival by Cox multivariable proportional hazards regression model was associated with two independent predictors: preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (P=0.021) and prolonged (>24 h) assisted ventilation (P=0.001). CONCLUSION S: Small incision sutureless AVR through both partial sternotomy and right anterior minithoracotomy provides excellent clinical outcomes. Right anterior minithoracotomy, though associated with longer operative times compared to partial sternotomy, may result in less perioperative morbidity, with no difference in early and mid-Term survival.
2018
Heart valve prosthesis implantation; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Sutureless surgical procedures; Treatment outcome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Valve; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Male; Prosthesis Design; Retrospective Studies; Sternotomy; Sutureless Surgical Procedures; Thoracotomy; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12317/60398
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact