AIM: Although minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) has been shown to cause less morbidity than conventional surgery, it has not yet received broad application. The purpose of this study was to evaluate sutureless implantation using the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis (Sorin Group, Saluggia, Italy) via ministernotomy. METHODS: Seventy-two patients (43 women, 29 men; mean age 77.4±5.3 years) with isolated aortic valve stenosis (mean gradient of 52±14 mmHg) underwent aortic valve implantation with the sutureless Perceval S bioprosthesis, following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), aortic cross-clamping (ACC), cardioplegic arrest and removal of the calcified native valve. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 9.7±6.2%. RESULTS: The prosthetic valve was successfully deployed in all patients. Thirty-day mortality was 1.4% (n=1). Mean CBP, ACC, and implantation times were 68±18, 40±13 and 8.9±4min, respectively. Perioperative echocardiography revealed significant paravalvular leakage in one patient. Postoperative mean gradient was 11.6±5.1 mmHg. At a mean follow-up of 13±6.7 months, no significant paravalvular leakage or valvular regurgitation was observed, and no migration or dislodgement of the prosthesis occurred. CONCLUSION: This study shows that sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis provides a simple and reproducible alternative for MIAVR. As the valve does not need to be sutured, it may also result in reduced ACC and CPB times. This self-anchoring valve may also allow the application of MIAVR to a broader spectrum of patients. This new technology needs a long-term follow-up. © 2014 Italian Federation of Cardiology.

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with Perceval valves: First clinical experience

Santarpino G.
;
2014-01-01

Abstract

AIM: Although minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) has been shown to cause less morbidity than conventional surgery, it has not yet received broad application. The purpose of this study was to evaluate sutureless implantation using the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis (Sorin Group, Saluggia, Italy) via ministernotomy. METHODS: Seventy-two patients (43 women, 29 men; mean age 77.4±5.3 years) with isolated aortic valve stenosis (mean gradient of 52±14 mmHg) underwent aortic valve implantation with the sutureless Perceval S bioprosthesis, following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), aortic cross-clamping (ACC), cardioplegic arrest and removal of the calcified native valve. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 9.7±6.2%. RESULTS: The prosthetic valve was successfully deployed in all patients. Thirty-day mortality was 1.4% (n=1). Mean CBP, ACC, and implantation times were 68±18, 40±13 and 8.9±4min, respectively. Perioperative echocardiography revealed significant paravalvular leakage in one patient. Postoperative mean gradient was 11.6±5.1 mmHg. At a mean follow-up of 13±6.7 months, no significant paravalvular leakage or valvular regurgitation was observed, and no migration or dislodgement of the prosthesis occurred. CONCLUSION: This study shows that sutureless implantation of the Perceval S aortic valve bioprosthesis provides a simple and reproducible alternative for MIAVR. As the valve does not need to be sutured, it may also result in reduced ACC and CPB times. This self-anchoring valve may also allow the application of MIAVR to a broader spectrum of patients. This new technology needs a long-term follow-up. © 2014 Italian Federation of Cardiology.
2014
aortic valve; surgical aortic valve replacement; sutureless implantation; Aged; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Cardiopulmonary Bypass; Female; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Operative Time; Prosthesis Design; Suture Techniques; Treatment Outcome; Bioprosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12317/60486
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact