In the original article, some numerical values in the following paragraph were reported incorrectly: “In fact, the direct method would give absorbed doses 5.6 (0.927 vs. 0.165 mGy/MBq) and 13.2 (1.88 vs. 0.142 mGy/ MBq) times higher for uterus and ovaries, respectively, compared with the method we adopted. Smaller, but still relevant, overestimations of 65 and 95 % would be obtained with the direct method for other important organs, such as the liver (0.921 vs. 0.570 mGy/MBq) and the kidneys (0.580 vs. 0.298 mGy/MBq), respectively (full data not shown)”. The paragraph has been updated to read: “In fact, the direct method would give absorbed doses 5.5 (0.907 vs. 0.165 mGy/MBq) and 5.2 (0.731 vs. 0.142 mGy/ MBq) times higher for uterus and ovaries, respectively, compared with the method we adopted. Smaller, but still relevant, overestimations of 62 and 94 % would be obtained with the direct method for other important organs, such as the liver (0.923 vs. 0.570 mGy/MBq) and the kidneys (0.577 vs. 0.298 mGy/MBq), respectively (full data not shown)”.
Correction to: Preclinical Evaluation and Dosimetry of [111In] CHX-DTPA-scFv78-Fc Targeting Endosialin/Tumor Endothelial Marker 1 (TEM1) (Molecular Imaging and Biology, (2020), 22, 4, (979-991), 10.1007/s11307-020-01479-8)
Cicone F.
;
2020-01-01
Abstract
In the original article, some numerical values in the following paragraph were reported incorrectly: “In fact, the direct method would give absorbed doses 5.6 (0.927 vs. 0.165 mGy/MBq) and 13.2 (1.88 vs. 0.142 mGy/ MBq) times higher for uterus and ovaries, respectively, compared with the method we adopted. Smaller, but still relevant, overestimations of 65 and 95 % would be obtained with the direct method for other important organs, such as the liver (0.921 vs. 0.570 mGy/MBq) and the kidneys (0.580 vs. 0.298 mGy/MBq), respectively (full data not shown)”. The paragraph has been updated to read: “In fact, the direct method would give absorbed doses 5.5 (0.907 vs. 0.165 mGy/MBq) and 5.2 (0.731 vs. 0.142 mGy/ MBq) times higher for uterus and ovaries, respectively, compared with the method we adopted. Smaller, but still relevant, overestimations of 62 and 94 % would be obtained with the direct method for other important organs, such as the liver (0.923 vs. 0.570 mGy/MBq) and the kidneys (0.577 vs. 0.298 mGy/MBq), respectively (full data not shown)”.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
