Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) etiology remains poorly understood, but chronic low-grade inflammation plays a role. Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) (1-50 Hz) is effective in reducing tissue inflammation. Objectives: We designed a pilot study to evaluate the effects of PEMF on prostate volume (PV) in BPH. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective interventional trial on 27 naive patients with BPH and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). At baseline (V0), all patients had blood tests, transrectal ultrasound, and questionnaires (IPSS, IIEF-15) and received a perineal PEMF device (Magcell®Microcirc, Physiomed Elektromedizin). PEMF was delivered on perineal area 5 minutes twice daily for 28 days, then (V1) all baseline evaluations were repeated. Afterward, nine patients continued therapy for 3 more months (PT group) and 15 discontinued (FU group). A 4-month evaluation (V2) was performed in both groups. Results: A reduction was observed both at V1 and at V2 in PV: PVV0 44.5 mL (38.0;61.6) vs PVV1 42.1 mL (33.7;61.5, P =.039) vs PVV2 41.7mL (32.7;62.8, P =.045). IPSS was reduced both at V1 and at V2: IPSSV0 11 (5.7;23.2) vs IPSSV1 10 (6;16, P =.045) vs IPSSV2 9 (6;14, P =.015). Baseline IPSS was related to IPSS reduction both at V1 (rs = 0.313;P =.003) and at V2 (rs = 0.664;P <.001). PV reduction in patients without metabolic syndrome (ΔPVV1nMetS −4.7 mL, 95%CI −7.3;-2.0) was greater than in affected patients (ΔPVV1MetS 1.7 mL, 95%CI −2.69;6.1)(P =.017, Relative RiskMetS = 6). No changes were found in gonadal hormones or sexual function. Discussion: PEMF was able to reduce PV after 28 days of therapy. Symptoms improved in a short time, with high compliance and no effects on hormonal and sexual function or any side effects. Patients with moderate-severe LUTS and without MetS seem to benefit more from this treatment. Conclusion: PEMF reduces PV and improves LUTS in a relative short time, in BPH patients. These benefits seem greater in those patients with moderate-severe LUTS but without MetS.

Therapeutic use of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy reduces prostate volume and lower urinary tract symptoms in benign prostatic hyperplasia

Tarsitano M. G.;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) etiology remains poorly understood, but chronic low-grade inflammation plays a role. Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) (1-50 Hz) is effective in reducing tissue inflammation. Objectives: We designed a pilot study to evaluate the effects of PEMF on prostate volume (PV) in BPH. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective interventional trial on 27 naive patients with BPH and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). At baseline (V0), all patients had blood tests, transrectal ultrasound, and questionnaires (IPSS, IIEF-15) and received a perineal PEMF device (Magcell®Microcirc, Physiomed Elektromedizin). PEMF was delivered on perineal area 5 minutes twice daily for 28 days, then (V1) all baseline evaluations were repeated. Afterward, nine patients continued therapy for 3 more months (PT group) and 15 discontinued (FU group). A 4-month evaluation (V2) was performed in both groups. Results: A reduction was observed both at V1 and at V2 in PV: PVV0 44.5 mL (38.0;61.6) vs PVV1 42.1 mL (33.7;61.5, P =.039) vs PVV2 41.7mL (32.7;62.8, P =.045). IPSS was reduced both at V1 and at V2: IPSSV0 11 (5.7;23.2) vs IPSSV1 10 (6;16, P =.045) vs IPSSV2 9 (6;14, P =.015). Baseline IPSS was related to IPSS reduction both at V1 (rs = 0.313;P =.003) and at V2 (rs = 0.664;P <.001). PV reduction in patients without metabolic syndrome (ΔPVV1nMetS −4.7 mL, 95%CI −7.3;-2.0) was greater than in affected patients (ΔPVV1MetS 1.7 mL, 95%CI −2.69;6.1)(P =.017, Relative RiskMetS = 6). No changes were found in gonadal hormones or sexual function. Discussion: PEMF was able to reduce PV after 28 days of therapy. Symptoms improved in a short time, with high compliance and no effects on hormonal and sexual function or any side effects. Patients with moderate-severe LUTS and without MetS seem to benefit more from this treatment. Conclusion: PEMF reduces PV and improves LUTS in a relative short time, in BPH patients. These benefits seem greater in those patients with moderate-severe LUTS but without MetS.
2020
BPH
inflammation
IPSS
LUTS
PEMF
prostate volume
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12317/73647
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact