Aim: This prospective, observational cohort study aimed to measure HbA1c change over 3–6 months in type 2 diabetes managed with basal-bolus insulin and FreeStyle Libre® Flash Glucose Monitoring System (FSL) use compared to self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG). Methods: Sixteen Italian hospitals enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 322, [109 FSL, 213 SMBG users]) using basal-bolus insulin therapy for ≥ 1 year, HbA1c 8.0–12.0% (64–108 mmol/mol), new to FSL use (<3 months) or continuing with SMBG (controls). Eligible FSL and SMBG users were matched (1:2 ratio) for baseline HbA1c (within ± 0.5%, recorded ≤ 3 months previously), study site and baseline data collection date. Results: Overall, baseline HbA1c was 8.9 ± 0.8% (74 ± 9 mmol/mol), age 67.2 ± 10.0 years, BMI 30.5 ± 6.5 kg/m2 and insulin use duration 8.6 ± 6.6 years (mean ± SD), 56.2% were males. After 3–6 months, 234 complete cases (83 FSL, 151 SMBG users) demonstrated significantly reduced HbA1c for FSL use compared to SMBG (0.3% ± 0.12 [3 mmol/mol ± 1.3, (mean ± SE)], p = 0.0112). The difference remained statistically significant after adjusting for confounders. Conclusions: HbA1c significantly improved in basal-bolus treated type 2 diabetes after flash glucose monitoring use for 3–6 months compared to SMBG.

The use of flash glucose monitoring significantly improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetes managed with basal bolus insulin therapy compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose: A prospective observational cohort study

Irace C.;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Aim: This prospective, observational cohort study aimed to measure HbA1c change over 3–6 months in type 2 diabetes managed with basal-bolus insulin and FreeStyle Libre® Flash Glucose Monitoring System (FSL) use compared to self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG). Methods: Sixteen Italian hospitals enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 322, [109 FSL, 213 SMBG users]) using basal-bolus insulin therapy for ≥ 1 year, HbA1c 8.0–12.0% (64–108 mmol/mol), new to FSL use (<3 months) or continuing with SMBG (controls). Eligible FSL and SMBG users were matched (1:2 ratio) for baseline HbA1c (within ± 0.5%, recorded ≤ 3 months previously), study site and baseline data collection date. Results: Overall, baseline HbA1c was 8.9 ± 0.8% (74 ± 9 mmol/mol), age 67.2 ± 10.0 years, BMI 30.5 ± 6.5 kg/m2 and insulin use duration 8.6 ± 6.6 years (mean ± SD), 56.2% were males. After 3–6 months, 234 complete cases (83 FSL, 151 SMBG users) demonstrated significantly reduced HbA1c for FSL use compared to SMBG (0.3% ± 0.12 [3 mmol/mol ± 1.3, (mean ± SE)], p = 0.0112). The difference remained statistically significant after adjusting for confounders. Conclusions: HbA1c significantly improved in basal-bolus treated type 2 diabetes after flash glucose monitoring use for 3–6 months compared to SMBG.
2022
Continuous glucose monitoring
HbA1c
Insulin therapy
Type 2 diabetes
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12317/73840
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact